Latest posts:

Posted on:

The best shift-left is to shift accessibility into AI model training and not bolting it on later

Staying curious and learning more about AI and where it can help with accessibility, I see a lot of work done with bolting it on instead of shifting it left. Seems that shift left needs us once again.

Posted on:

2026 deserves proactive accessibility governance

Regressions happen, but proper processes can prevent a lot of it. With accessibility it may be more difficult, but systems can help. Fixing one bug and introducing another one reveals poor system processes – consider accessibility governance.

Posted on:

AI will soon deliver code that will pass automatic testing by default

Thanks to Michael Fairchild and Microsoft, we now have some accessibility benchmarks for a selected range of AI models – where they were tested with automatic accessibility tools after generating sample code. Project is called A11y LLM Eval, and it provides quite some insights, both directly and indirectly.

Posted on:

Quick accessibility analysis of Norwegian party websites just before election

Long story short – all political party websites have issues, some are really obvious and all are excluding some groups of people. They should do better if they want to get votes from as many as possible. And shift accessibility left does not mean political left!

Posted on:

Countdowns and timers – forgotten detail that can make your users really hate your product

Please make sure you consider all users when developing countdowns, timers and similar dynamic information or risk making some experiences horrible.

Posted on:

A beginning of a new international accessibility era

You have probably read a lot about EAA, I know I have. It is an amazing thing, I am certain, but there are some parts that are not so amazing. This post informs you about both parts, we need to understand before we can improve.

Posted on:

Common Accessibility Issues of Norwegian Mobile Banking Applications

This is a summary for my Universal Design 2024 (UD2024) conference contribution, where I was using parts of EN 301 549 and WCAG to check how (in)accessible are iOS and Android mobile applications from 4 largest Norwegian banks.

Posted on:

Some tips for keyboard support on native mobile applications

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines touch keyboard accessibility in a couple of success criteria. It’s essential for your native app to support keyboard interactions for it to be accessible. But how?

Posted on:

Accessibility group – often overlooked native mobile app pattern

Grouping is not an exact science, but all designers and developers touching native mobile applications need to be aware of the simplification possibilities it can bring.

Posted on:

Native mobile app accessibility – choice of platform is essential

Native mobile applications are often more focused and with that – less noisy for users (and I meant that visually and non-visually). But platform choices can lead to inevitable inaccessibility as some abstractions lack support.

Posted on:

My contribution to second AccessibleEU conference in Slovenia (DIGIN 2024) – inaccessibility of e-commerce

I lead a project to manually test 20 Slovenian e-commerce websites and wrote an article about it, called (In)Accessibility of Slovenian E-commerce the Year Before the European Accessibility Act.

Posted on:

Web Accessibility Directive with positive accessibility effects beyond public sector

Time flies and after four years of directive we can reflect a bit more on the positive effects beyond public sector.

Posted on:

Briefly on conflicts between aesthetics and accessibility requirements

Question of dealing with conflicts between aesthetics and accessibility comes up a lot and sometimes it’s easy to just let one side win and be done with it. I think that we need a cultural shift to have both of them.